Preparing your space
Your library and workspace are being arranged now.
Preparing your space
Your library and workspace are being arranged now.
Loading the business overview…
Explore the research to see how business evidence informs assumptions and valuation.
Start with the business evidence, then follow the assumptions through to scenarios and valuation.
Valuation and assumptionsNews Corp is a diversified media and information services company whose economics are primarily driven by Dow Jones digital subscriptions and professional information growth, REA Group's Australian property portal franchise, and US housing turnover for Realtor.com. Its principal competitive advantage is REA Group's network effects and Dow Jones's proprietary data and switching costs, while its most important vulnerabilities are the Murdoch governance discount, the Rightmove acquisition risk, and structural print decline. Under the base case, Dow Jones reaching $850-900m EBITDA and REA continuing to compound at double-digit rates imply intrinsic value of approximately $34-36 per share versus a market price of $29.38. The investment therefore depends primarily on whether the conglomerate discount narrows as buybacks reduce the share count and Dow Jones grows into a larger share of consolidated EBITDA. The most important evidence to monitor is Dow Jones Segment EBITDA progression, REA Group's Rightmove bid resolution, and US existing home sales data.
News Corp trades at roughly $29 per share, an enterprise value of about $16.3bn against FY2026 Segment EBITDA of $1.63bn. Its 62%-owned ASX-listed REA Group stake alone is worth an estimated US$8.8–9.4bn at current market prices [S15]. Dow Jones generated $663m of Segment EBITDA in FY2026 and management has laid out a credible path to $1bn within five years [S5]. The central tension is that the market values the whole company at not much more than the sum of two of its parts.
The biggest risk is capital allocation: REA Group is pursuing a £6.2bn acquisition of Rightmove in the UK [S14]. If REA overpays, 62% of that value destruction lands on News Corp shareholders. The thesis does not require a re-rating. It requires that the underlying assets keep compounding cash flow, that buybacks continue at or near the FY2026 pace, and that the conglomerate discount does not widen further. On my base case, intrinsic value is approximately $34 per share, with a bear case near $22 and a bull case near $48. Probability-weighted value is roughly $34.50, implying a 3-year annualized return in the high single digits to low double digits including buybacks and dividends. The evidence that would most strengthen the thesis is a disciplined resolution of the Rightmove bid and continued Dow Jones EBITDA progression toward the $1bn target.
REA Group has a moderate-to-wide moat. The network effect is powerful: more listings attract more buyers, which attracts more agents, which produces more listings. The evidence is in the margin (60%+ EBITDA margin), the pricing power (13% yield growth on flat listings), and the dominant audience share (146.4m monthly visits). Competitors cannot easily replicate the installed base of agent relationships or the buyer traffic. The moat is durable as long as REA does not destroy it through overpriced acquisitions or a botched product transition.
Dow Jones has a narrow-to-moderate moat. The WSJ brand and the professional information data sets (Risk & Compliance, Energy benchmarks) create switching costs. Risk & Compliance benefits from decades of proprietary data and regulatory complexity; the cost of an error for a financial institution is far greater than the price of the product [S4]. Dow Jones Energy has more than 150 exchange-traded benchmarks embedded in commodity contracts, which is a genuine proprietary moat [S4]. The consumer subscription business has lower switching costs and competes with The New York Times, Bloomberg, and free content.
HarperCollins has a narrow moat. Scale in author relationships and backlist catalogues matters, but the business does not have structural pricing power. Bestseller performance is hit-driven.
News Media has essentially no moat. Brand equity in The Sun and The Australian is real but diminishing.
On a consolidated basis, I rate the moat narrow, weighted toward the REA Group and Dow Jones assets. The consolidated company's returns on capital are modest because of the low-margin News Media and Other segments. If REA Group were valued separately, its ROIC would be very high. The consolidated ROIC, however, is dragged down by the legacy assets.
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Time horizon | Leading indicator | Priced in? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REA overpays for Rightmove | Medium | High | 0–12 months | REA share price reaction, final offer price | Partially |
| US housing stays depressed | Medium | Medium | 1–3 years | Mortgage rates, existing home sales | Partially |
| AI disrupts news advertising | Medium | Medium | 2–5 years | Digital ad revenue trends at Dow Jones | Partially |
| Dow Jones misses $1bn EBITDA target | Low-Medium | High | 3–5 years | Risk & Compliance growth rate | Not fully |
| News Media structural decline accelerates | High | Low | Ongoing | Print circulation, ad revenue | Yes |
| Fox-News re-merger on unfavourable terms | Low | Medium | 0–24 months | Public confirmation of talks | No |
| Governance/succession disruption | Low | High | Any | Murdoch family news | No |
| Print book market contraction | Low | Low | 1–5 years | HarperCollins physical sales | Partially |
Business risk: The biggest business risk is that the US housing market remains in a multi-year slump, keeping Realtor.com earnings depressed. This is partly cyclical but could be structural if remote work and higher rates permanently reduce transaction volume.
Financial risk: Low. The balance sheet is conservative, debt maturities are well-laddered, and interest coverage is high.
Valuation risk: The stock trades at a discount to SOTP, but the discount could persist or widen. If the market continues to apply a 30–40% conglomerate discount, the shares could remain range-bound even as earnings grow.
Tail risk: A Fox-News Corp re-merger at an unfavourable exchange ratio, or a major AI-related litigation loss that damages Dow Jones's content licensing model.
Forecasting 5 years (FY2027–FY2031), then terminal value.
| Year | Revenue ($bn) | Growth | EBITDA margin | EBITDA ($bn) | D&A ($bn) | EBIT ($bn) | Tax ($bn) | NOPAT ($bn) | Capex ($bn) | WC change ($bn) | FCF ($bn) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2027 | 9.45 | 4.7% | 18.5% | 1.75 | 0.50 | 1.25 | 0.31 | 0.94 | 0.45 | 0.05 | 0.44 |
| FY2028 | 9.90 | 4.8% | 19.0% | 1.88 | 0.52 | 1.36 | 0.34 | 1.02 | 0.47 | 0.05 | 0.50 |
| FY2029 | 10.40 | 5.1% | 19.5% | 2.03 | 0.54 | 1.49 | 0.37 | 1.12 | 0.49 | 0.05 | 0.58 |
| FY2030 | 10.95 | 5.3% | 20.0% | 2.19 | 0.56 | 1.63 | 0.41 | 1.22 | 0.51 | 0.05 | 0.66 |
| FY2031 | 11.50 | 5.0% | 20.5% | 2.36 | 0.58 | 1.78 | 0.45 | 1.33 | 0.53 | 0.05 | 0.75 |
Terminal value = FY2031 FCF × (1 + g) / (WACC - g) = $0.75bn × 1.025 / (0.091 - 0.025) = $11.65bn [Est.].
Present value of FCFs: $0.44/1.091 + $0.50/1.091² + $0.58/1.091³ + $0.66/1.091⁴ + $0.75/1.091⁵ = $2.28bn [Est.].
PV of terminal value: $11.65bn / 1.091⁵ = $7.53bn [Est.].
Enterprise value: $2.28bn + $7.53bn = $9.81bn [Est.].
Add net cash of $0.11bn: equity value = $9.92bn [Est.].
Per share: $9.92bn / 558.4m = $17.76 [Est.].
This DCF produces a value well below the SOTP. The reason is that the consolidated FCF is modest relative to the asset values. The DCF captures the cash flow of the whole company, but it does not capture the market value of the REA Group stake, which trades at a premium to its cash flow contribution. The DCF is a useful sanity check but not the primary valuation method for a holding company with a listed subsidiary.
To justify $29.38 per share, the equity value would need to be $16.4bn. With net cash, enterprise value is $16.3bn. Using the same WACC and terminal growth, the implied FY2031 FCF would need to be approximately $1.25bn [Est.], roughly 67% above my base case. That would require EBITDA of $3.2–3.5bn by FY2031, implying a 12–13% EBITDA CAGR. This is achievable if Dow Jones hits $1bn EBITDA and Digital Real Estate reaches $1.5bn EBITDA, but it is above management's stated targets for Dow Jones and assumes a strong US housing recovery.
| Metric | NWSA FY2026 | Peer context |
|---|---|---|
| P/E (adjusted) | 24.9x | NYT ~25x, RELX ~28x |
| P/E (reported) | 28.5x | — |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.0x | NYT ~12x, Zillow ~15x |
| EV/Sales | 1.8x | NYT ~3.5x |
| Price/FCF | 20.2x | — |
| FCF yield | 4.9% | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.7% | — |
Source: price of $29.38 [S7], diluted shares 558.4m, FCF $811m [S2], EBITDA $1.63bn [S1].
News Corp trades at a discount to peers on EV/EBITDA and EV/Sales. The discount is justified by the conglomerate structure and the lower-quality News Media and Other segments. It is not justified if the company is viewed as a sum of its parts.
This is the most appropriate method for a holding company with a listed subsidiary.
| Asset | Valuation method | Value ($bn) | Per share ($) |
|---|---|---|---|
| REA Group stake (62%) | Market value | 9.1 | 16.30 |
| Dow Jones | 15x FY2026 EBITDA of $663m | 9.95 | 17.82 |
| HarperCollins | 9x FY2026 EBITDA of $287m | 2.58 | 4.62 |
| Realtor.com | 12x estimated EBITDA of $100m | 1.20 | 2.15 |
| News Media | 5x FY2026 EBITDA of $139m | 0.70 | 1.25 |
| Other corporate costs | -8x FY2026 EBITDA of -$203m | -1.62 | -2.90 |
| Net cash | Balance sheet | 0.11 | 0.20 |
| Total SOTP | 22.02 | 39.44 |
Source: REA Group market cap from Morningstar/Simply Wall St [S15]; FY2026 EBITDA from 10-K [S1]; per-share calculations [Est.].
Applying a 15% conglomerate discount (justified by the Murdoch governance structure and historical capital allocation issues) gives an intrinsic value of $33.52 per share [Est.]. A 25% discount gives $29.58, almost exactly the current price.
Trigger: REA Group completes the Rightmove acquisition at £6.2bn, overpaying by 20–30%. Simultaneously, the US housing market remains depressed, and Dow Jones EBITDA growth slows to 5% annually.
Operating mechanism: REA's ROIC falls as it integrates a lower-margin UK asset. News Corp's share of REA's earnings growth is offset by acquisition-related amortization and integration costs. Realtor.com revenue stagnates. Dow Jones misses the $1bn target.
Financial consequence: FY2031 consolidated EBITDA reaches only $2.0bn instead of $2.5bn. FCF stagnates at $800m–900m.
Valuation consequence: SOTP falls to $18bn, or $32/share. With a 30% discount, intrinsic value is $22 per share.
Probability: 25%.
Trigger: REA walks away from Rightmove or acquires it at a disciplined price. Dow Jones grows EBITDA to $850–900m by FY2029 and approaches $1bn by FY2031. US housing recovers modestly. HarperCollins normalizes.
Operating mechanism: Digital real estate and Dow Jones continue to drive margin expansion. Buybacks reduce share count by 2% annually. The conglomerate discount narrows modestly from 25% to 15% as the company demonstrates consistent FCF growth and disciplined capital allocation.
Financial consequence: FY2031 EBITDA reaches $2.5bn. FCF reaches $1.3bn.
Valuation consequence: SOTP of $24bn, or $43/share. With a 15% discount, intrinsic value is $36.50 per share.
Probability: 50%.
Trigger: Dow Jones hits the $1bn EBITDA target ahead of schedule. REA acquires Rightmove at a fair price and creates value. US housing recovers to 5.5m annual sales. The market re-rates Dow Jones at 18x EBITDA and reduces the conglomerate discount to 5%.
Operating mechanism: Multiple re-rating on the sum of the parts, driven by visible growth in high-margin information services and a successful international expansion at REA.
Financial consequence: FY2031 EBITDA reaches $2.8bn. FCF reaches $1.5bn.
Valuation consequence: SOTP of $28bn, or $50/share. With minimal discount, intrinsic value is $50 per share.
Probability: 25%.
0.25 × $22 + 0.50 × $36.50 + 0.25 × $50 = $5.50 + $18.25 + $12.50 = $36.25 per share [Est.].
At $29.38, the upside to probability-weighted value is 23.4% [Est.], or approximately 7.3% annualized over three years, before adding the ~3.5% annual shareholder yield from buybacks and dividends. Total expected return is approximately 10.8% annualized over three years [Est.].
A collection of good assets (REA Group, Dow Jones) mixed with structurally challenged ones (News Media, print publishing). Consolidated ROIC is below WACC.
REA Group has a moderate-to-wide moat. Dow Jones has a narrow-to-moderate moat. HarperCollins and News Media have little or no moat.
The REA Group investment is a triumph. The FY2026 buyback acceleration is well-timed. The Foxtel exit was correct. The Rightmove bid is a risk. Governance is a persistent concern.
Net cash balance sheet, investment-grade credit rating, well-laddered debt, strong FCF conversion.
Modest consolidated growth, but high-quality growth in Dow Jones B2B and Digital Real Estate. News Media is a drag.
The stock trades at a 20–25% discount to SOTP. EV/EBITDA of 10x is below peers. FCF yield of 4.9% is respectable.
Asymmetric upside if the conglomerate discount narrows. Downside protected by the REA Group stake and net cash. Key risk is capital allocation.
Not a high-quality compounder, but a reasonably attractive sum-of-the-parts opportunity with a visible catalyst path.
Is this a good business? It is a good collection of businesses, not a uniformly good business. REA Group and Dow Jones are excellent. News Media and print publishing are challenged.
Is it becoming stronger or weaker? Stronger. Digital revenue is now 61% of total revenue, up from a much lower base a decade ago [S23]. Margins are expanding. The balance sheet is stronger.
Does it possess a durable competitive advantage? Yes, in REA Group (network effects, dominant share) and Dow Jones professional information (proprietary data, switching costs). The consolidated moat is narrow.
What are the 3 most important drivers of future value? (1) Dow Jones EBITDA growth toward $1bn. (2) REA Group's market value and acquisition discipline. (3) US housing turnover and Realtor.com performance.
What are the 3 largest risks? (1) REA overpaying for Rightmove. (2) Dow Jones growth stalling. (3) The conglomerate discount persisting or widening.
What is the most important dependency? Dow Jones's professional information business, which requires proprietary data, regulatory complexity, and customer trust.
What does the market appear to be pricing in? A permanent 20–25% conglomerate discount, Dow Jones at 10–12x EBITDA, and limited credit for Realtor.com's recovery potential.
Where could the market be wrong? The market may be underestimating Dow Jones's value as a standalone information services company and Realtor.com's operating leverage in a housing recovery.
What is fair intrinsic value? Approximately $34–36 per share on a sum-of-the-parts basis, applying a 15% conglomerate discount.
What is the margin of safety at today's price? Approximately 15–20% on the base case. At $29.38, the stock is priced for a persistent 25% discount.
What annualized return could reasonably be expected over 3 to 5 years? Approximately 10–14% in the base case, with a wide range (bear: negative; bull: 25%+). The business-fundamentals-only return is approximately 7–9%.
What single development would most strengthen the thesis? REA Group walking away from Rightmove or acquiring it at a disciplined price, removing the capital allocation overhang.
What single development would most invalidate it? REA Group completing the Rightmove acquisition at a price that clearly overpays, destroying ROIC at the company's best asset.
At what price would the stock become clearly attractive? Below $26, the discount to SOTP would exceed 30%, and the FCF yield would exceed 5.5%.
What price would imply excessive optimism? Above $40, the stock would be trading at a premium to a conservative SOTP, leaving little margin of safety.
Investment thesis: News Corp is a diversified media and information services company whose economics are primarily driven by Dow Jones digital subscriptions and professional information growth, REA Group's Australian property portal franchise, and US housing turnover for Realtor.com. Its principal competitive advantage is REA Group's network effects and Dow Jones's proprietary data and switching costs, while its most important vulnerabilities are the Murdoch governance discount, the Rightmove acquisition risk, and structural print decline. Under the base case, Dow Jones reaching $850–900m EBITDA and REA continuing to compound at double-digit rates imply intrinsic value of approximately $34–36 per share versus a market price of $29.38. The investment therefore depends primarily on whether the conglomerate discount narrows as buybacks reduce the share count and Dow Jones grows into a larger share of consolidated EBITDA. The most important evidence to monitor is Dow Jones Segment EBITDA progression, REA Group's Rightmove bid resolution, and US existing home sales data.
News Corp does not separately disclose pension liabilities, lease obligations, or stock-based compensation in the platform-verified data. The precise EBITDA contribution of Move/Realtor.com within the Digital Real Estate segment is not separately disclosed. The standalone valuation multiple for Dow Jones is an analytical estimate with no exact comparable.
These model scenarios depend on their inputs. Review the assumptions and supporting evidence alongside the implied values.
earnings multiple v2 · as of 2026-09-12
Sign in for the price chart, where every input traces back to a filing, an adjustable scenario sandbox, and companies that move with NWSA.
Create a free account →